Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Case Rep Oncol ; 16(1): 188-203, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2306667

ABSTRACT

Novel coronavirus-19 (COVID-19) variants continue to spread worldwide with the development of highly transmissible strains. Several guidelines addressing management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic have been published, primarily based upon expert opinion. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected all aspects of breast cancer care including screening, diagnosis, treatment, and long-term follow-up. Recent reports indicate that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can provoke lymphadenopathy in both cancer patients and healthy individuals. Unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy (UAL) post-COVID-19 vaccination is a challenging presentation for cancer patients because of the potential for misinterpretation as malignancy. The World Health Organization's target to vaccinate 70% of the world's population by mid-2023 is likely to increase the incidence of post-COVID-19 vaccination UAL. In this article, we review the published evidence regarding UAL post-COVID-19 vaccination and present diverse cases of breast cancer patients where false-positive UAL post-COVID-19 vaccination proved to be a therapeutic challenge. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) vaccination program is well ahead of other countries in the world, having accomplished the target of 100% vaccination of the population with at least one dose. Therefore, an increasing number of recently vaccinated patients are likely to present with UAL, detected by surveillance imaging, post-vaccination. We have therefore made recommendations regarding the management of cancer patients with UAL post-COVID-19 vaccination in order to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary imaging or invasive biopsy procedures.

2.
Jpn J Radiol ; 41(6): 617-624, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2174888

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy is known to occur after coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccination. Post-vaccination lymphadenopathy may mimic the metastatic lymph nodes in breast cancer, and it is challenging to distinguish between them. This study investigated whether the localization of axillary lymphadenopathy on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be used to distinguish reactive lymphadenopathy after COVID-19 vaccines from metastatic nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively examined preoperative MRI images of 684 axillae in 342 patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from June to October 2021. Lymphadenopathy was defined as cortical thickening or short axis ≥ 5 mm. The axilla was divided into ventral and dorsal parts on the axial plane using a perpendicular line extending from the most anterior margin of the muscle group, including the deltoid, latissimus dorsi, or teres major muscles, relative to a line along the lateral chest wall. We recorded the presence or absence of axillary lymphadenopathy in each area and the number of visible lymph nodes. RESULTS: Of 80 axillae, 41 and 39 were included in the vaccine and metastasis groups, respectively. The median time from the last vaccination to MRI was 19 days in the vaccine group. The number of visible axillary lymph nodes was significantly higher in the vaccine group (median, 15 nodes) than in the metastasis group (7 nodes) (P < 0.001). Dorsal lymphadenopathy was observed in 16 (39.0%) and two (5.1%) axillae in the vaccine and metastasis groups, respectively (P < 0.001). If the presence of both ventral and dorsal lymphadenopathy is considered indicative of vaccine-induced reaction, this finding has a sensitivity of 34.1%, specificity of 97.4%, and positive and negative predictive values of 93.3% and 58.5%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The presence of deep axillary lymphadenopathy may be an important factor for distinguishing post-vaccination lymphadenopathy from metastasis. The number of axillary lymph nodes may also help.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Lymphatic Metastasis , COVID-19/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Vaccination , Axilla/pathology
3.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 219(4): 559-568, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1963272

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND. The variable clinical course of subclinical lymphadenopathy detected on breast imaging after COVID-19 vaccination creates management challenges and has led to evolving practice recommendations. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess the duration of axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to COVID-19 vaccination detected by breast imaging and to assess factors associated with the time until resolution. METHODS. This retrospective single-center study included 111 patients (mean age, 52 ± 12 years) with unilateral axillary lymphadenopathy ipsilateral to mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administration performed within the prior 8 weeks that was detected on breast ultrasound performed between January 1, 2021, and October 1, 2021, and who underwent follow-up ultrasound examinations at 4- to 12-week intervals until resolution of the lymphadenopathy. Patient information was extracted from medical records. Cortical thickness of the largest axillary lymph node on ultrasound was retrospectively measured and was considered enlarged when greater than 3 mm. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of time until resolution. RESULTS. The mean cortical thickness at the initial ultrasound examination was 4.7 ± 1.2 mm. The lymphadenopathy resolved a mean of 97 ± 44 days after the initial ultrasound examination, 127 ± 43 days after the first vaccine dose, and 2.4 ± 0.6 follow-up ultrasound examinations. A significant independent predictor of shorter time to resolution was Pfizer-BioNTech (rather than Moderna) vaccination (ß = -18.0 [95% CI, -34.3 to -1.7]; p = .03]. Significant independent predictors of longer time to resolution were receipt of the second dose after the initial ultrasound examination (ß = 19.2 [95% CI, 3.1-35.2]; p = .02) and greater cortical thickness at the initial ultrasound examination (ß = 8.0 [95% CI, 1.5-14.5]; p = .02). Patient age, history of breast cancer, and axillary symptoms were not significantly associated with time to resolution (all p > .05). CONCLUSION. Axillary lymphadenopathy detected with breast ultrasound after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination lasts longer than reported in initial vaccine clinical trials. CLINICAL IMPACT. The prolonged time to resolution supports not delaying screening mammography because of recent COVID-19 vaccination. It also supports the professional society recommendation of a follow-up interval of at least 12 weeks when vaccine-related lymphadenopathy is suspected.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Early Detection of Cancer , Female , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , Lymphatic Metastasis , Mammography , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies
4.
Eur Radiol ; 32(10): 6598-6607, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1844357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess ultrasound characteristics of ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes after two doses of four different COVID-19 vaccination protocols, to determine whether these parameters differed with age, and to describe how they changed on follow-up imaging. METHODS: A total of 247 volunteer employees from our center who had received two doses of COVID-19 vaccination were recruited and followed prospectively. Axillary ultrasound of the ipsilateral vaccinated arm was performed the week after receiving the second dose to analyze lymph node features (number, long-axis, cortical thickness, morphology, and vascular imaging). Axillary lymphadenopathy resulting from four vaccination protocols-mRNA (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273), ChAdOx1-S, and mix-and-match-was compared. Analysis was conducted using the Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni corrections. Nodal reactogenicity was evaluated for two age groups: young (< 45 years old) and middle-aged ( ≥ 45 years old). All parameters were compared between both groups using an unpaired-sample Student t test. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Significantly higher values for total number of visible nodes, cortical thickness, Bedi's classification (p < 0.001), and vascularity (p < 0.05) were observed in mRNA vaccine recipients compared to full ChAdOx1-S protocol recipients. Moreover, mix-and-match protocol recipients showed greater nodal cortical thickness and higher Bedi's classification than full ChAdOx1-S recipients (p < 0.001). Analyses between age groups revealed greater cortical thickness, Bedi's classification, and color Doppler signal in younger patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Nodal parameters of Bedi's classification and cortical thickness were more often increased in mRNA and mix-and-match vaccine recipients when compared to ChAdOx1-S vaccine alone, especially in younger patients. KEY POINTS: • Hyperplastic lymphadenopathy was observed more frequently in mRNA and mix-and-match vaccine protocols compared to full vector-based vaccination. • Higher values for cortical thickness, Bedi's classification, and color Doppler signal parameters were identified in younger patients. • Observed lymph node findings normalized in greater than 80% of patients by the third month following vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , RNA, Messenger , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vaccines, Synthetic , mRNA Vaccines
5.
Clin Imaging ; 85: 78-82, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1708841

ABSTRACT

Metastatic melanoma of the breast is rare, and demonstrates nonspecific imaging findings which may overlap with both benign and malignant pathology.1-3 Immunohistochemical stains are important to confirm the diagnosis, particularly combining S100, a sensitive marker for melanoma, with more specific tumor markers such as Melan-A and HMB-45, and lack of cytokeratin staining.4-7 We present a case of a 64-year-old female who presented for diagnostic imaging of a palpable abnormality in her right breast, with medical history notable for previously excised cutaneous melanoma, recent COVID-19 vaccination, and significant family history of breast cancer. Diagnostic mammogram of the right breast demonstrated a circumscribed mass in the lower inner quadrant corresponding to the area of palpable concern, as well as an additional non-palpable circumscribed mass in the lower inner quadrant. Targeted right breast ultrasound demonstrated corresponding circumscribed cystic versus solid masses as well as a morphologically abnormal right axillary lymph node. Pathologic results after tissue sampling of the two right breast masses and right axillary lymph node all yielded metastatic melanoma.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Melanoma , Skin Neoplasms , Axilla/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Female , Humans , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Melanoma/diagnostic imaging , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Skin Neoplasms/pathology
6.
Eur Radiol ; 32(5): 3199-3206, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1469687

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted in order to investigate COVID-19 vaccine influence on unilateral axillary lymph nodes, comparing nodal basal features with their characteristics after the first and second vaccination dose. METHODS: Ninety-one volunteer employees from our center who participated in the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccination campaign were prospectively recruited. A total of three axillary ultrasound evaluations of the ipsilateral vaccinated arm were performed: before vaccination, the week after the first dose and the week after the second dose. The following findings were recorded: the total number of visible nodes, the maximum measurements of the diameter and cortex, Bedi's classification, and color Doppler evaluation. The collected data were compared using paired-sample Student's t-test for quantitative continuous variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for ordinal variables. Additional analyses were performed after classifying patients according to the previous history of COVID-19 disease. Differences among both groups were evaluated with the Mann-Whitney U test. Variables with a p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Comparative analyses between the three US examinations showed a statistically significant augmentation of total visible nodes, maximum diameter, cortical thickness, grade of Bedi's classification, and Doppler signal (p < 0.001). Analyses between patients with and without previous COVID-19 infection showed a higher lymph node response in naïve patients compared to those who were previously infected. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, both doses of COVID-19 vaccine induced an increase of all axillary lymph node parameters with statistically significant differences, especially in coronavirus-naïve patients. KEY POINTS: • Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine induces a high incidence of ipsilateral axillary lymphadenopathy. • US scan identified an increase of all lymph nodes parameters, especially in coronavirus-naïve patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lymphadenopathy , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lymphadenopathy/diagnostic imaging , Lymphadenopathy/etiology , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL